Friday, November 9, 2012

The Hangover

Thanks to an Anonymous little birdie for the thread.

Even as most Freepers continue their tantrum, some few are groping towards sanity. A lot of encouraging crow eating re: Nate Silver. A lot of "FRAUD" based ankle-biting, too:

BlueStateRightist is doing some soul-searching
With regard to Nate Silver: Don’t blame the messenger. I blame myself for hanging high hope on the words of Dick Morris and Michael Barone. Even the vaunted Scott Rasmussen, who missed by a couple critical percentage points here and there, gave me some misguided optimism.
ScottinVA explains that his previous certitude was actually hope:
He was dead-on right. Amazingly.

I really thought turnout would overcome his predictions, but... nope.
Longbow1969 explains about episystemic closure:
the "majority" never predicted Obama to win. The majority on some conservative sites and Fox News maybe, but in the greater media universe the vast majority correctly picked Obama to win a narrow election. This includes seasoned election analysts like Cook, Sabato, Rothernberg, etc, - all thought Obama would win. Only the conservative echo chamber that was foolishly claiming all the polls were skewed thought otherwise.
Strategerist really lets his fellow Freepers have it:
I harbored the hope there was some sort of systemic bias in the state polls, or there would be a Bradley effect - though I thought the whole “Unskewed Polls” business was nonsense all along. I actually attacked Silver a bit on some other boards, which I regret.

The Unskewed Polls page will end up one of the greatest embarrassments to the Right there ever has been.

Beyond all the other groups that Republicans have to appeal to somehow in the future (Women, Hispanics, etc.) there’s another one - the highly educated. Rabid hatred of scientific methods in attacks on polling, etc. doesn’t help (to say nothing of creationism, and other issues.)
palmer sets a fellow Freeper straight about the whole fraud hypothesis:
1. Romney/Ryan got less votes this year than McCain/Palin did in 2008.
2. Romney/Ryan won in every state that had voter ID laws.

Is this reasonable, or is something else at play?


They haven't finished counting.
G Larry, though, is still stuck on fraud:
They keep citing demographic vote turnout that simply doesn’t reflect observable reality.

College campuses around the country had little or no activity, yet turnout was reported above 2008 levels.

That theme was repeated across many demographics.

For that reason I continue to believe massive, organized vote fraud was a major factor in this election.
AmericaUnited knows Silver was getting fed data, so he's not the genius, some other guy no one knows about it!!
He’s a damn cheat. Almost certainly he got the Zero internal polls again.
Uncle Chip thinks Silver is awesome at modeling voter fraud:
He was accurate because he factored in the vote fraud endemic in the early voting, the bloated registrations, the Democrat machines across the country, and the fecklessness of the GOP to do anything about it.

9 comments:

  1. Over/under for Strategerist's zotting?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was surprised he didn't get it during the election thread. He had the audacity to speak rationally in it and was getting lambasted for it. I just realized I may be more pathetic than these maniacs for knowing this. But I guess that means I have the ability to be introspective, so I'm still better than them.

      Delete
    2. "There are plenty of people on FR (perhaps even a majority" that live in a fantasy world that believes if Sarah Palin ran in 2016 with her top platform planks being making abortion illegal in all circumstances, banning gay marriage and re-banning homosexuality in the military, and getting prayer back in schools, that she would win because this mythical true conservative base would magically show up at the polls." by Strategesrist

      Obviously he is out of his mind, zots up with that.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for pointing to this thread, I haven't seen so many Freepers with their heads above the sand in so short a space - ever, I think.

    (It's still only like four, but still.)

    I will put money on a purge from JimRob. Post-Freepathon would be my guess?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Someone needs to inform Palmer that Obama won VA and the ID....at least I had to show my ID as I voted for Obama...HA HA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, what I think he means is Romney won all the states where photo ID to vote is required. But those are all deep red states Romney would have won anyway.

      Delete
  4. The racism is out in full force now with a few wondering how Republicans can win with their shrinking demographics, to which the racists spew their ugliness. There is a really ugly heart at the base of modern American conservatism and there might end up being a real sort of GOP internal uncivil war over the next few years as the remaining moderate conservatives wrestle for control with the shitty racists they've used for these years.

    Will it happen? Will the GOP finally kick out the racists they invited in after the Democrats kicked them out?

    As far as Freep goes, I doubt JimRob is going to purge the racists he's got on his boards. They probably donate too much money. Eventually, Freep might become Stormfront Lite.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Becomes? I mean you already have Jim Rob banning posts from the competition. This is the site that regularly refers to minorities as "Holder's people", "yutes" and "the Amish". This is the site where probably the third or fourth most popular topic is the impending second Civil War in which cities are going to be deathpits thanks to animalistic hordes of minorities.

      Delete
  5. Freepers discuss why Asian-Americans voted overwhelmingly for President Obama. I think this thread is particularly instructive.

    Toward the end one guy says,

    "Why did 70% of the white Jews vote Obama, in that case? Asian voting (esp. Chinese and Indian) is influenced by university education, just like with the Jews. They see the Republicans as people who’d like to instate a theocracy if they could, and the media has been very successful in projecting the Republicans as people with an anti-science, anti-technology bias."
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2957367/posts?page=59#59


    ReplyDelete