Friday, September 27, 2013

Spotlight Friday: traditional1



Huh. Looks like this guy got suspended round about Tuesday. Can't tell why.

Well, traditional1 has gone down the road so many partisans get to - nihilism. No one has done what he knows has to be done, so now we're doomed. All elections are stolen, all cities are taken over by the 'tribal parasite class' and there is no hope. Well, maybe Cruz and Palin, but they are probably doomed.


Democratic Voter fraud is everywhere:
If it’s close, Dem vote fraud will assure a Dem win.....happens everywhere in every election.
Chuck Schumer? Totally gay:
Yeah; Chuckie...you faggots stick together, alright (pun intended).

Slimeball.
The poors are all lazy!
about 15 million of them didn't have a job during the year

How many of those 15 million are U.S. Citizens, and, more importantly, how many of those 15 million have NEVER worked for a living, but are 4th generation inner-city tribal parasites?

These "poor" are mere tools on the Democrat Plantation, who have no intentions of EVER being employed and doing other than living off others' earnings, handed to them in so many ways, shapes, and forms.

You should have 3 years (or less) allowable living on Assistance, and then, you are on your own!
IMAGINE a REAL POTUS
Today, in honor of Bisexual Visibility Day there will be a White House roundtable discussion “about issues facing the bisexual community” attracting bisexual activists from around the nation

THIS is how low Amerika has sunk...can you even IMAGINE a REAL POTUS entertaining sex deviates, and making such a mockery of The Office???

We are the laughingstock of the world now......
Feminists aren't lesbians, they're sluts!
Horny Men everywhere rejoice in Women's "liberation", where they have casual sex freely, and abort the babies, so men can have a good time with NO RESPONSIBILITY for their actions, whatsoever....
The ever shrinking GOP tent:
[Obama's] meeting with only Democrats (McConnell and Boehner are Democrats, for all intents and purposes, and have NO opposition to whatever The Messiah tells them to do, and they go along with the Dem’s whenever necessary. Their phony “for show” antics are only to allow them to falsely claim they are fighting him......what a disgusting pair of whores....
OBAMAPHONES!!!!!!
Does ANYONE doubt that the Progressives, using their propoganda arm (the State-Run-Media) will not be 24/7 showing starving Seniors, children, poor people and such, blaming it ALL on Republicans, the Tea Party, Extreme-Right-Wingers, etc., and selectively PUNISHING everyone EXCEPT there voterbase????

Do you EVER hear anyone talk about cutting the $2 Billion spent on Obamaphones in ANY of this? No? Why?

Because Obamaphones NEARLY EXCLUSIVELY are used by inner-city tribal parasites only, and THEY cannot be inconvienienced, and if an attempt were made to stop the practice of "Free Cellphones" for them, Holder would IMMEDIATELY launch a Civil Rights Complaint to show "Disparate Impact".

Why can we not show "Disparate Impact" on the set-asides for inner-city tribal parasites that are in place NOW, and stop the handouts????? Obamacare has "Disparate Impact", too, in that those who live off others (Welfare parasites) will not have to pay for it, while those who work for a living DO HAVE TO PAY? How is that "Equal Protection" for this "tax" (as John Roberts decided)?????
The oppression of not being able to say nigger:
We have NATIONALLY banned Free Speech; you can't use the "N" word, under penalty of "Hate Crime", etc.

How is the "N" word not protected by "Free Speech"?
2016 is already stolen, time for Civil War 2!
It will make NO difference in 2016 WHO runs as a (D)....the fix is in, the Elections are now all KNOWN as to outcomes (Fraud, Electronic control of the "vote count", and a parasitic majority of people in the USA who live off others, ALL will result in continued Communist/Socialist/Progressive/Anti-Constitution/anti-Christianity/Indoctrination and State-Run-Media control until a Civil War or Revolution occurs.

There's now way to win back this country at the "ballot box", and those who don't believe that are delusional.

Good luck.....
Only ethnics are on food stamps:
Hmmmm.....

WHY is it that ONLY Ethnics are complaining about their EBT's gonna be cut, whereas, there's no outcry from Whitey?

Couldn't be that the EBT's are used for lots o' things, other than FOOD, could it?

Drug Testing, Public Works MANDATORY work, and LIFETIME suspension from Public Assistance IN ALL FORMS for anyone caught using that Assistance ILLEGALLY, OR, a 5 year suspension if you are on Public Assistance OF ANY KIND, if you fail Random Drug Testing, PERIOD.

Yeah; I know....." THAT's RACIST".....

22 comments:

  1. This is his second suspension

    ReplyDelete
  2. Allen West fired at PJ Media for calling a colleague a Jewish American Princess and telling her to shut up. There are 93 replies so far, almost all of which see no problem with the term and are agreeing with him, etc. It's glorious. I'm going to save this whole thread incase it gets pulled.

    http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3071669/posts

    ReplyDelete
  3. You know if West was a liberal they would all be saying how anti-semtic he is..

    ReplyDelete
  4. We have NATIONALLY banned Free Speech; you can't use the "N" word, under penalty of "Hate Crime", etc.

    He's right...that totally happened! If memory serves, it was right after Obama teamed up with Hugo Chavez and Susan Sarandon to make gay abortions mandatory for all Christian gun owners.

    How is the "N" word not protected by "Free Speech"?

    It's funny how many Constitution-lovin' conservatives have no fucking clue what "freedom of speech" means. They seem to think it means total personal freedom from criticism and consequences.

    Funny, too, how often they whine about not feeling free to say "nigger" whenever and wherever they please without getting criticized for it. For normal people, that's about as oppressive a situation as not feeling free to take a shit on the sidewalk at high noon. For people who don't have massive psychological problems, the temptation isn't likely to arise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll grant your premise. But your description of the way it happened is way off.

      The law is the law. Tradition, however, is both ironclad and never questioned.

      Not exactly picking sides here - both sides have used that tactic in about the same measure (off the top of my head, it's late, been up since 4 AM and have a party to attend - fun one, Daughter is due in 3 weeks. :) ) But it is the single most effective tactic to shutting down discussion on a topic that exists. Keep using buzz words to change the meaning.

      Let us take the 3 inalienable rights for example. Life? Tell that to the ocean if your plane crashes or your ship sinks. Liberty? Hit up death row some time. Pursuit of happiness - now that is one no one can take from you. You also got no guarantee you'll get there.

      Yet those three so called rights are the very bedrock of the constitution. They don't exist, because the universe is a malicious bitch that doesn't care and is run by Murphy's law. God cares - so I hope and believe - but hey, the dude is busy, right?

      As far as first amendment goes, I say let them speak as they will. I respect their right to call someone a nigger, for example. In return they need to respect my right to respond to that with a fist to the face. Sign language is still a language, right?

      Sorry - button issue. Look at the various amendments closely and every single one of them gives room for special pleading. I hate to see it from my side (right) as much as from the left. It is repulsive to me. It is an imperfect system.

      Making a perfect one is probably impossible.

      Delete
    2. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are phrases in the non-legal, non-binding Declaration of Independence. None of those rights exist in the Constitution.

      Delete
    3. 'll grant your premise. But your description of the way it happened is way off.

      The law is the law. Tradition, however, is both ironclad and never questioned.


      I assume this is in response to my comment at 12:23? If so, I'm sorry but I have no idea what you're going on about.

      My point was first that the word "nigger" has not been nationally banned; second, that using the word does not, in and of itself, constitute a hate crime under U.S. law; and third, that I often see conservatives misrepresenting "freedom of speech" as a) a right not to be censored or otherwise denied a public form by private citizens or companies; or b) a right not to be questioned, criticized or asked for an apology after saying something provocative or offensive.

      Do you disagree with any of this? If so, please try to make the nature of that disagreement a bit clearer. As it stands, we seem to be talking right past each other.

      Delete
    4. Just to clarify a bit more:

      As far as first amendment goes, I say let them speak as they will. I respect their right to call someone a nigger,

      As do I. What I don't respect is their seeming desire to be...well, respected for it. If it's important to you to use an offensive word, you need to be able to accept the possible consequences of being offensive. In this case, one of the likely consequences is getting called a racist and being asked to apologize. My problem with this all-too-common conservative take on "freedom of speech" -- and please note that I'm speaking here of movement conservatives as they actually exist in the real world, as opposed to some abstract notion of what "true" conservatives should believe by definition -- is that they'll trumpet the free-speech right to be offensive while challenging the free-speech right of other people to criticize them for it.

      In return they need to respect my right to respond to that with a fist to the face. Sign language is still a language, right?

      I get that you're joking here, but no, hitting people is not sign language, obviously, nor is it a legally protected form of "speech." I have no problem with a person who calls someone "nigger" getting punched in the nose, but it's not relevant to the basic misunderstanding of free speech that I'm talking about here.

      To be fair, I sometimes see people on the left making the same error (e.g., referring to a censored blog comment as a violation of first-amendment rights...the sad truth is, most Americans are pretty ignorant about this stuff. That said, FReepers and their ilk tend to be very, very vocal about their unique, unsurpassable love and understanding of the Constitution, so it's a bit more irritating when they start spouting nonsense about it.

      Delete
    5. I don't think we are talking past each other. Seem to be in pretty close agreement, just phrasing it in different ways. Happens - language is imprecise and the combination of tired and stressed out does not make for a very clear reply! My apologies for that. :)

      The basic point (very poorly expressed by me) was the rights Freepers (and others) bang on about - sure, in a just world they are rights - but they also come with duties attached to them.

      First Amendment? Sure, I got the right to say what I wish. I don't have the right to have people listen to me.
      Second? Yep, I have the right to bear arms. Doesn't give me the right to shoot the place up if I lose a game of pool.

      If I read you right - and I hope I am - you and I are looking at the same word. Responsibility. Rights and duties balance out. Your right to life - for example - I am duty bound to respect that by not only not killing you but by also being careful (not drink driving, as an example) and I should aid you if you are in a dangerous situation.

      Make sense? It is something I have had a hard time expressing in the past. Especially to conservatives.

      Delete
    6. Can I just add that that these conversations get confusing when everyone's name is "Anonymous."

      Delete
    7. Well, you're certainly welcome to at least choose "Name/URL" in the drop down box, if not sign in with your own Google, WordPress, etc. ID. I agree, it does get confusing.

      Delete
  5. If it’s close, Dem vote fraud will assure a Dem win.....happens everywhere in every election.

    Yes, because that totally happened in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah but euphgeek, the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections weren't close... They were decisive Republican victories. See "Bush has a mandate."

      Delete
    2. It is truly remarkable how Freepers never had a problem with Diebold electronic voting machines, voter roll purges, voter intimidation by local law enforcement, reports of votes being flipped from Kerry to Bush, exit poll irregularities, and so on and so on, until now. They didn't want to hear about it. But now they're alleging all the same tactics are being used againt them, without a hint of self-awareness, just because their party is clearly too crazy to win any elections except in the most partisan and gerrymandered districts.

      Delete
  6. Jim is having surgery but he reassures the troops that the Freeperthon will run as planned.

    P.S. Onyx and Amy and Chris and John and our wonderful fundraising team are going to do all they can to ensure that our fourth quarter fundraiser, that is scheduled to start Tuesday morning, gets kicked off on time and is successfully completed. Thank you all again!!

    FReepers are the absolute greatest!!

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3071913/posts?q=1&;page=501

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn. Not fond of the miserable old sod, but hope it turns out well for him.

      Delete
    2. This. His politics/attitude towards people may suck but I wouldn't wish this on anyone.

      Delete
    3. Yep, dehumanizing people is the first step towards Freeperdom.
      I do hope it all turns out well for him.

      Delete
  7. The owner of this blog needs to go join Dummie Underground LOL!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...

      Our trolls are generally pretty high quality, so if you want to be noticed either up your arguments or vulgarity.

      Delete
  8. You did biology 101, right?

    Barbie can not, by definition have a cock. Poor Ken on the other hand, got really short changed.

    ReplyDelete