Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Blame women

Via Anon

As Freepers get ever more desperate to deal with the GOP's base-driven slide into demographic doom, they've turned on blacks, on Mexicans, on poor people, and on women. For whatever reason, there's a little boomlet of women hating going up at the moment, and it's as hilariously over the top as the Fluke debacle.

Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America is frustrated, and advocates more ranting about Democrats:
I'm no dummy. I see what I see EVERY election cycle, and what I see is the same OL' SH!T. The Democrats HYPNOTIZE the females against the 'traditional old white guy' party Republican candidate and IT WORKS.

I feel like this is the TOP ISSUE which Republican candidates must confront, and that will require OPENLY DISCUSSING THE MANIPULATION OF FEMALES BY DEMOCRATS. Cuccinelli needs to proclaim "You females are smarter than subjecting yourself to being USED by the PROVEN LIAR Democrats!.. DON'T FALL FOR IT. YOU FELL FOR OBAMACARE, HOOK LINE AND SINKER. YOU WERE LIED TO, LADIES, AND THEY'RE LYING TO YOU AGAIN!! THEY AREN'T WHO OR WHAT THEY SAY THEY ARE."

I'm F'ing SICK AND TIRED of watching females huddle together with Marxists, totally clueless that they've put their children's futures in jeopardy in exchange for a totally bogus emotional catharsis of the moment. I cannot stand this anymore. I'm SICK of it.
Ohh, elkfersupper, you're always the most misogynist!
The Founding Fathers were correct.

Those people should never have been allowed to vote or run for office. They are certifiably insane 25% of the time, combative 50% of the time and actively resistant to what men think is important the rest of the time.
ToastedHead can't stay on topic, but brings some quality crazy:
I only get screwed by government when I try to act like a contributing member of society. The key is to do as little as humanly possible.
ToastedHead continues to veer wildly.
It’s incorrect to group together “women” as a voting block. The split on votes from a human with girly parts probably goes right along with the split on all humans that pay taxes.

Across the board, I bet you can see a direct relationship between the percentage of taxes paid on income (not investment) and percentage R vote, regardless of race and sex.
poobear is not buying it.
Why are females so easily manipulated by the Democrats?

Because, I have found, that they vote based on

feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelings.

Not all, of course, but most.


Yeah Puppage, not this bitch! I think it’s cover for voter fraud! Massive voter fraud!
And then you have women like FrdmLvr, who are so committed to the cause, they hate women.
As a woman, I have to say I wholeheartedly agree with you.

12 comments:

  1. FrdmLvr is more common on FR than not.
    The harpy contingent would vote to disenfranchise all women from the vote.

    Please note, however, no voices are calling for the banning of women running for office ...
    in a conservative cognitive dissonance display, the same harpies would call for the zot on any man saying Saint Sarah of Wassila should be disallowed from office.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Rahspet mah authorotah !"

      -Eric Carman
      Colorado

      Delete
  2. That first post needs to be in the dictionary as an example of "mansplain."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RichStraightWhiteChristianManSplainin's the national pastime at freeper gulch.

      Delete
  3. In a thread about the election in Virginia, Forward the Light Brigade wrote, "The Black slaves will roll out and vote for the Democrat to put him over the top in Virginia. Never fails—and if its should—they can stuff the ballot boxes and rig the polls. They will get the guy Obama approves of. In time there will be no states—only districts of Federal control—with czars appointed by Obama.'
    http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3087938/posts?page=74#74



    ReplyDelete
  4. Alright, there will be no states, but will there be Rollerball?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can't tell if the freeper was actually asked to vote for the democrat or if he just assumed the approaching black man was going to make him vote democrat. I'm guessing the latter.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that we may have found our new Stratergist. Meet snarkybob!

    http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:snarkybob/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change

    "The reality is Obama got re-elected and is currently the president. And BTW lots of people didn’t vote for Romney which is why Obama is still president lol.
    Obamacare is going to be a painful mess, I’ll grant you that, but that power point scenario where it all lands on the democrats and the conservatives are the heroes is just silly.
    I get that yours is a happy little fantasy, and those are great, but if you start really believing it then get POd when it doesn’t happen or when someone points out that it’s not logical that’s unrealistic. Like being ticked off everytime you don’t win the lotto and then getting more ticked off when someone tells you how high the odds of winning are."

    "I agree no one fears Sarah Palin, but there’s really no reason to fear her. She doesn’t have any power. She gave up being an elected official and is now a media celebrity.
    I know she’s great at throwing red meat to the already coverted but the MSM and Tina Fey savaged her enough in 2008 that nobody outside the small world of conservative political junkies even pays any attention to her.
    I’ll be beyond surprised if she runs in 2016 although I won’t be surprised if she alludes to running and then writes another book."

    "If you say so I guess. Not sure exactly how reality will make them reverse their views about gay rights. Like I said most of them have friends or family members that are gay. They don’t have an issue with it. No real place for that to go really as they’re against child molesters and rapists regardless of sexual orientation.
    I do believe that the official GOP stance on gay issues is going to become more libertarian."

    "One of the biggest concerns I have whenI read FR is how we seem to applaud the folks that throw the red meat, but the minute they deviate, even a bit, we turn on them.
    I’ve been a Freeper a long time and I was a lurker since the late 90s. I remember when GWB was a hero here. I also remember when Freepers were solidly for Karl Rove, Fred Thompson, Bill OReilly, and most of the neocons and the list goes on and on.
    I really expect that as soon as Cruz stops throwing the red meant and has to compromise, even just a little bit to move to the ball forward, a lot of people here will turn on him."

    Reason? Logic? Compromise? What do the brave Freepers think of such things, you ask?

    "““Waaaah, waaaaah” snarkybob cries...those mean old Repukes can’t be winning, waaaaaah.
    You’re a tool. A sleeper troll. Post back to me in a week. The GOP still won’t have caved.
    Idiotic.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does he listen to Snarky Puppy (music group) ?

      Delete
  7. At least those men were out advocating instead of whining on Freerepublic doing nothing but alienating most Americans. LOL. You know reading that thread I'm thinking that if another 911 happened in NYC Freepers would be dancing in the streets. I've seen way to many Eff NY posts on FR during the last few years.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Geez he could've just said 'thanks' and continued into the voting area.

    ReplyDelete
  9. actively resistant to what men think is important the rest of the time.

    Boo fucking hoo.

    ReplyDelete